One company could have made every other deal free

One of the best-performing companies I ever backed became one of my biggest disappointments. And the lesson it taught me is the one I'd most want a newer investor to learn before they need to.

When I first found this company, I was already convinced the market was about to shift in that particular direction. Then I met a founder who'd seen the same shift, except he'd already built the product and launched it, in about three months. Solo founder, second time around, and the execution speed was extraordinary.

I beta tested the app myself as part of diligence. I emailed him some feedback on a Friday. By the next week, all of it was already in the product. Speed, obsession, a feedback loop tighter than anything I'd seen. Those are the signals you hope for at the early stage, so I invested in the seed round at a £25 million valuation.

It took off; Revenue grew over 1,000%, a new round came in around a 10x markup on my entry, at £250 million, with institutional funds joining. Not long after, the company received a term sheet valuing it at over a billion pounds.

When a fund issues a term sheet, it has usually already done serious work. Terms agreed, diligence underway. It felt real. Some of us angels started talking about a secondary sale, because at that valuation it was over a 40x return for me.

I'll be honest about what that meant. I'd had exits before, but this would have been the biggest by far. It would have returned more than double everything I'd invested across my entire angel portfolio. One company, paying back the whole portfolio twice over, making every other investment effectively free.

Then the market turned.

This is the part I think newer investors underestimate most. Venture moves in cycles, and the environment can change fast. The billion-pounds term sheet was pulled. The market reset hard, and the valuation that existed on paper stopped existing in reality.

The founder fought hard for alternative funding. But runway was tightening, the burn was getting more painful, and the company had taken on venture debt. Debt changes everything. Once it's in the picture, time pressure climbs, because now you don't just need growth, you need liquidity. Then one day we were told the company was shutting down.

This wasn't a bad founder. It wasn't a product that didn't work. It was one of the fastest success stories I'd backed. Venture can simply be unforgiving when market timing, capital structure and the funding environment all move against a company at once.

Two things I took from it

First, the number on paper is not money in your account. A 40x means nothing until liquidity actually arrives through a secondary purchase, an acquisition, or an IPO. Newer investors start mentally counting outcomes that haven't happened, and the emotional whiplash when they evaporate is brutal. I felt it. The discipline is to treat paper marks as exactly that until the money clears.

Second, it matters enormously which funds you invest alongside. The VC funds in this deal didn't take board seats. During hypergrowth, governance is what creates accountability and oversight, and it's often the thing that catches operational stress while a company still looks flawless from the outside. Without strong representation on the board, those warning signs get missed until it's too late.

I think about that deal often, because it's a big part of why House of Arāya works the way it does. When members invest, they come in beside the fund, not on their own. The oversight and board involvement a solo angel rarely gets is already there, working for them, before anything starts to go wrong. It's the thing I didn't have in that deal, and wish I had.

I walk through this whole story, and what I'd do differently, in this week's video if you want to see it play out.

What this means for you

If you take one thing from this, let it be the one that actually protects you: diversification and portfolio construction. This company failed, and it barely touched my overall returns, because the rest of the portfolio was strong enough to carry it. The same structure that makes one loss survivable is what makes one breakout life-changing. You build for both at once.

I still believe most of the original insight behind that company was right. Venture is humbling like that. Sometimes your biggest lesson comes from the deal you were most sure about.

Because this video is about how investment decisions actually get made, I want to give you something concrete. I've put together a free teardown of one of our actual investments at Arāya. What I saw, how I evaluated it, what the terms looked like, and what I learned. It's called Inside the Decision.

Warmly,
Rupa

P.s. When you're ready, here are 3 ways you can help: